风险治理制度范式的起源与变迁:科学与政治的共生论视角  

The Origin and Change of Risk Governance Regime:Within the Co-production Framework of Science and Politics

作　　者：黄晓伟 HUANG Xiaowei(School of Marxism,Tianjin University,TianJin,300350)

机构地区：[1]天津大学马克思主义学院,天津300350

出　　处：《自然辩证法通讯》2021年第12期83-90,共8页Journal of Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“互构论视域的算法风险生成逻辑及治理机制研究”(项目编号:19CZX012)。

摘　　要：本研究从STS科学民主化研究的科学与政治共生论视角出发,以风险治理的红皮书模式为切入点,讨论了"服务于政策的科学"领域中的科学与政治关系是如何实现从"完全分离"向"互构共生"变迁的。研究的基本结论有三个:第一,科学与政治完全分离的假设源自启蒙思想家们的现代性筹划,主要表现为技术统治论和政治决断论两种模式;第二,风险治理制度范式之所以最先产生于20世纪80年代的美国,是实用主义科学观(适用的真理)与政治观(参与式民主)互构共生的产物;第三,无论是美国本土对红皮书模式的有限修正,还是欧洲国家对这一模式的能动改造,仍然贯穿着科学与政治深度共生的逻辑。Center on the red book model of risk governance,this paper discusses the changing relationships between science and politics in the sub-field of“science for policy”.Specifically,the research question is how the relationship between science and politics has developed from“complete separation”to“co-production”.Within the co-production framework of science and politics in STS,three basic conclusions can be drawn:firstly,a complete separation between science and politics is a theoretical hypothesis which originates from the modernity project by enlightenment thinkers,with technocracy and decisionism as two sub-hypotheses;secondly,the first risk governance regime emerged in the USA in 1980s,which results from the co-production of pragmatic view of science(serviceable truth)and politics(participatory democracy);thirdly,the deep co-production logic of science and politics continues to function during the moderate change in the USA as well as the active transformation in the Europe.

关 键 词：风险治理 制度范式 红皮书模式 科学与政治的共生论 

分 类 号：N01[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学] D0-02[政治法律—政治学]