法律面前人人平等的内在张力与适用——基于已公开的判决文书的研究  

The Inherent Tension and Application of Equality before the Law

作　　者：江秋伟 Jiang Qiuwei

机构地区：[1]广东工业大学政法学院

出　　处：《法治社会》2021年第6期67-80,共14页Law-Based Society

摘　　要：在现代国家,法律面前人人平等构成了法治的重要内容。基于法院适用法律面前人人平等的204个司法案例的考察,法院适用法律面前人人平等原则主要包括两种类型,即司法上人人平等与立法上人人平等。在法院实践中,大部分案例涉及立法上人人平等,主要涉及限制高利息、死亡、伤残赔偿金、农村征地补偿、消费者保护等,与相对而言弱势的法律主体有关。其他部分案例涉及司法上人人平等,主要涉及国家机关和公民应当依法办事。然而在法院实践中,依然存在在推理上简单化以及在理解上单薄化法律面前人人平等的问题。从规范上而言,应当通过适用意义上的平等与内容意义上的平等具体化人人平等的规范品格。基于以人性尊严为主、立法尊让为辅的审查基准,对法律、行政法规、规范性文件、司法文件等进行审查,保障人人平等。In modern countries,equality before the law constitutes an important part of the rule of law.Based on the investigation of 204 judicial cases of equality before the law,there are two types,namely,equality in the judiciary and equality in the legislation.In the practice of the court,most of the cases belong to the equality in the legislation,mainly involving restrictions on high interest,death and disability compensation,rural land acquisition compensation,consumer protection,etc.,which are related to relatively vulnerable legal subjects.Other parts of the case belong to the equality in the judiciary,mainly involving the fact that state organs and citizens should act in accordance with the law.However,in the practice of the court,there are some problems with reasoning and understanding.From a normative point of view,the normative character of equality should be embodied.Based on the review criteria based on human dignity and supplemented by legislative concession,laws,administrative regulations,normative documents and judicial documents should be reviewed to ensure equality for all.

关 键 词：司法平等 立法平等 人性尊严 审查基准 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]