检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]沈阳经济技术开发区开发集团有限公司,辽宁沈阳110027 [2]辽宁天益达环境工程技术有限公司,辽宁沈阳110166 [3]辽宁省沈阳生态环境监测中心,辽宁沈阳110167 [4]沈阳大学,辽宁沈阳110044
出 处:《环境保护与循环经济》2021年第10期21-24,33,共5页environmental protection and circular economy
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(21507091)。
摘 要:以北方某沿海城市为例,通过收集资料、划分子区域、识别环境风险源及环境风险受体和调查区域突发环境事件应急能力及防治措施等,采用区域环境风险指数计算法与网格化环境风险分析法计算案例区域环境风险等级,对比分析2种方法区域环境风险评估结果。结果表明,案例区域水环境风险、大气环境风险和综合环境风险2种方法计算结果差异较大。指数法适用区域综合环境风险等级判断,网格法适用小尺度区域水、大气环境风险等级精确计算。Take a coastal city in the north,through data collection,subregion division,identification of environmental risk source and environmental risk receptors,investigation of regional emergency response capacity and prevention measures,the regional environmental risk level of the case was calculated by using the regional environmental risk index calculation method and the grid environmental risk analysis method,the regional environmental risk assessment results of the two methods were compared and analyzed.The results show that there is a great difference in the calculation results between the two methods of regional water environment risk,atmospheric environment risk and comprehensive environmental risk.It shows that the index method is applicable to regional comprehensive environmental risk level judgment,the grid method is suitable for the accurate calculation of the risk level of water and atmosphere environment in small scale area.
关 键 词:区域环境风险 环境风险指数法 网格化环境风险分析法 对比分析
分 类 号:X820.4[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.239