长期移居高原大学生的情绪体验及加工特征  

Emotional experience and processing characteristics of long-term plateau immigrant undergraduates

作　　者：代杉 党鹏 马海林[3] 魏高峡 王妍[1,2] Dai Shan;Dang Peng;Ma Hailin;Wei Gaoxia;Wang Yan(Center on Aging Psychology,CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health,Institute of Psychology,Beijing 100101,China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;Plateau Brain Science Research Center,Tibet University,Lhasa 850000,China;CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health,Institute of Psychology,Beijing 100101,China)

机构地区：[1]中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室老年心理研究中心,北京100101 [2]中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049 [3]西藏大学高原脑科学研究中心,拉萨850000 [4]中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室,北京100101

出　　处：《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2021年第11期1017-1022,共6页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(31771247)。

摘　　要：目的调查长期移居高原大学生正性、负性情绪的主观体验和加工特征。方法采用SPSS 22.0进行统计分析,采用独立样本t检验比较高原组(成年后移居海拔3658 m地区满2年的58名本科生)与平原组(从未到过高原的58名本科生)状态焦虑量表(state anxiety inventory,SAI)、抑郁自评量表(self-rating depression scale,SDS)、正性负性情绪量表(positive and negative affect schedule,PANAS)评分以及对正性、中性和负性三类情绪图片效价、唤醒度评价的差异。两组状态焦虑、抑郁阳性检出率进行χ^(2)检验,SAI、SDS和PANAS得分进行Pearson相关分析。结果高原组状态焦虑、抑郁阳性检出率(67.24%,56.90%)及得分[(44.45±8.57)分,(50.12±10.11)分]皆高于平原组[46.55%,32.76%,(40.19±9.58)分,(44.64±9.17)分,χ^(2)=5.06,8.12,t=2.52,3.06,均P<0.05]。高原组正性情绪得分[(28.16±5.39)分]有低于平原组[(30.28±6.51)分]的趋势,但差异无统计学意义(t=-1.91,P=0.059)。SAI,SDS,PANAS得分两两呈中度相关(r=0.69,-0.52,0.67,-0.62,0.53,均P<0.01)。正性情绪与负性情绪轻度负相关(r=-0.27,P<0.01)。正性情绪与抑郁相关度(r=-0.62)大于与状态焦虑的相关度(r=-0.52,t=2.57,P<0.05),负性情绪与状态焦虑的相关度(r=0.67)大于与抑郁的相关度(r=0.53,t=1.71,P<0.05)。高原组对中性图片的效价评分[(3.06±0.20)分]高于平原组[(2.99±0.20)分,t=2.01,P=0.047]。结论长期移居高原的大学生易产生状态焦虑和抑郁,以抑郁为主、焦虑次之,并表现出对中性刺激加工的正性偏向。Objective To investigate the subjective experience and processing characteristics of positive and negative emotions in undergraduates who have immigrated to the plateau for a long time.Methods SPSS 22.0 was used for data analysis.Using independent sample t-test to compare various data from the plateau group(58 undergraduates who had moved to an altitude of 3658 m for over 2 years after reaching adulthood)with the plain group(58 undergraduates who had never been to the plateau),including the state anxiety inventory(SAI),self-rating depression scale(SDS),positive and negative affect schedule(PANAS),and the affective valency and arousal on the positive,neutral,and negative emotional pictures.Andχ^(2) test was conducted for the positive detection rates of state anxiety and depression of the two groups.Then,Pearson correlation analysis was performed on SAI,SDS and PANAS scores.Results The positive detection rates(state-anxiety:67.24%,depression:56.90%)and scores of state anxiety(44.45±8.57)and depression(50.12±10.11)in the plateau group were all higher than those in the plain group(46.55%,32.76%,(40.19±9.58),(44.64±9.17)respectively,χ^(2)=5.06,8.12,t=2.52,3.06,all P<0.05).In addition,positive affect scores of the plateau group(28.16±5.39)tended to be lower than those of the plain group(30.28±6.51),but the difference was not statistically significant(t=-1.91,P=0.059).SAI,SDS and PANAS scores were moderately correlated each other(r=0.69,-0.52,0.67,-0.62,0.53,all P<0.01).Positive affect was mildly negatively correlated with negative affect(r=-0.27,P<0.01).The correlation between positive emotion and depression(r=-0.62)was greater than that between positive emotion and state anxiety(r=-0.52,t=2.57,P<0.05).The correlation between negative emotion and state anxiety(r=0.67)was greater than that between negative emotion and depression(r=0.53,t=1.71,P<0.05).The valency score of neutral images in the plateau group(3.06±0.20)was higher than that in the plain group((2.99±0.20),t=2.01,P=0.047).Conclusion The long-term pl

关 键 词：高原 状态焦虑 抑郁 正性情绪 负性情绪 

分 类 号：G444[哲学宗教—心理学]