检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于洋 侯新月 袁安丽 高月 YU Yang;HOU Xinyue;YUAN Anli;GAO Yue(Heilongjiang Water Conservancy Research Institute, Harbin 150000,China;Suihua Development and Reform Commission, Suihua 152000,China)
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省水利科学研究院,黑龙江哈尔滨150000 [2]黑龙江省绥化市发展和改革委员会,黑龙江绥化152000
出 处:《水利科学与寒区工程》2021年第6期58-60,共3页Hydro Science And Cold Zone Engineering
摘 要:本研究针对当前寒区堤防护坡优选主观经验决策的局限性,以哈尔滨市阿什河干流道为例,构建多指标评价体系,引入熵权系数评价模型对不同堤防护坡方案进行优选。结果表明:熵权系数模型可将主观经验和客观信息有机结合,计算结果更为科学可靠;不同堤防护坡方案以铰链生态护坡熵权系数评价值最高(综合效益最优),达到0.993,可作为阿什河干流道外香坊段堤防护坡的主要方案。In view of the limitations of subjective experience decision-making in the optimization of embankment protection slope in cold regions,this study takes the main channel of Ashi River in Harbin as an example,constructs a multi-index evaluation system,and introduces the entropy weight coefficient evaluation model to optimize different embankment protection slope schemes.The results show that the entropy weight coefficient model can organically combine subjective experience and objective information,and the calculation results are more scientific and reliable.In addition,the entropy weight coefficient evaluation value of hinge ecological slope protection is the highest(namely comprehensive benefit is the best),reaching 0.993,which can be used as the main scheme of embankment slope protection in Xiangfang section of the main channel of Ashi River.
分 类 号:TV871[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104