论境外陪审员制度及其中国实践  

The Application and Adjustments of Overseas Jurors Institution in China's Mainland

作　　者：江保国[1] JIANG Bao-guo(South China Agricultural University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510642,China)

机构地区：[1]华南农业大学人文与法学学院,广东广州510642

出　　处：《时代法学》2021年第6期96-107,共12页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“粤港澳大湾区商事纠纷解决合作机制研究”(编号:19BFX205)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：境外陪审员制度发源于历史上的混合陪审团,同侪审判理念和程序正义内核是支撑其存在的正当性基础,但其具有的政治功能与同侪代表性要求之间存有一定的矛盾关系,使其在开放和封闭两端摇摆不定。福建和广东两地实践的港澳台陪审员制度也受到同侪审判、商事促进等理念激发,与其他国家的境外陪审员制度有相似甚至偶合之处,但其所具有政治参与和区际整合功能决定了其范围只宜是具有中国籍的港澳台地区居民,而其所具有的浓厚专家陪审色彩,决定了其在《人民陪审员法》施行后需要合理调适,实行一定程度的功能分化并采取措施提升其代表性。Based on the idea of trying by one s peers and due process,the practice of overseas jurors originated from mixed juries in medieval England,while recent discussions and legislations found it in a dilemma of inclusiveness or exclusiveness due to the tensions between the representativeness and political functions of modern jury system.The use of jurors from Hong Kong,Macao and Taiwan in courts of Fujian and Guangdong was similarly stimulated by purposes of procedural justice and commerce promotion,but its political integration function limits itself to Chinese nationals,and its elite color distinguish itself from its western counterpart and need some adjustments to enhance its multiple functions and representativeness after the passing of People s Assessors Act.

关 键 词：境外陪审员 港澳台陪审员 同侪审判 专家陪审 人民陪审员法 

分 类 号：D997.3[政治法律—国际法学]