检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:童峰[1] 徐林[2] 陈瑞 TONG Feng;XU Lin;CHEN Rui(School of International Law and Sociology,Sichuan International Studies University,Chongqing 400031,China;Department of Economics,Sichuan Provincial Party School of the Communist Party of China,Chengdu 610072,China;School of Government Management,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
机构地区:[1]四川外国语大学社会与法学院,重庆400031 [2]中共四川省委党校经济学教研部,成都610072 [3]北京师范大学政府管理学院,北京100875
出 处:《上海大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第6期84-94,共11页Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(19BSH173)。
摘 要:二战后福利国家经济危机所致的财政紧缩催生了福利治理的诞生,这充分证明了过分依赖政府提供高福利水平的制度是很难具备可持续性的。在重建福利供给的过程中,每一个参与主体都有通过福利治理来推动自身提升抗风险能力并改善福利供给水平的权责。在此逻辑下,政府于保障房片区内购买公共服务的过程,因兼具保障性与治理性双重需求的社区类型以及复杂的客观因素,导致了福利困境的出现。以N市H保障房片区为典型案例,通过收集数据并筛选走访对象等方法,调查得出,政府在购买公共服务后,在社区组织提供服务时出现了供求割裂的窘境,以及公共服务项目可持续性不足等问题,本研究进一步对此类问题进行了深入的探讨和分析,为现阶段我国福利治理提供了有益的参考。The financial austerity caused by economic crises in welfare states after World War II gave riseto welfare governance. However, the system that relied too much on the government to provide generous welfareproved to be hardly sustainable. Studies have shown that in the process of rebuilding the welfare supply, eachparticipating subject has the right and responsibility to promote its own risk-resisting ability and improvewelfare supply through welfare governance. Against such backgrounds, however, welfare dilemmas arose whenlocal governments purchased public services in government-subsidized housing areas, caused by specificcommunity type requirements for both subsidy and governance and other complex objective factors. Taking theH government-subsidized housing area in N city as a typical case, we made an investigation through datacollection and screening of interviewees, finding that other problems followed the government’s purchase ofpublic services. For instances, community organizations were confronted with the supply-demand gap;publicservice projects proved to be hardly sustainable. In view of this, we conducted further in-depth discussions andanalysis in the hope of providing useful reference to China’s current welfare governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3