检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张璇[1] 李思頔 Zhang Xuan;Li Sidi
机构地区:[1]北京市海淀区人民法院
出 处:《电子知识产权》2021年第11期73-81,共9页Electronics Intellectual Property
摘 要:数字经济时代下,数据作为“21世纪的石油”,其价值受到广泛关注,尤其是其中的平台数据保护逐渐成为备受议论的话题。本文从当前平台数据保护路径的困境为切入,通过分析赋权模式和责任规则的利弊,提出了在现阶段尚不宜对平台数据采用赋权的强保护模式,而竞争法作为具有“三元叠加”保护模式的责任规则,可针对平台数据侵权行为进行个案判断,无疑更加契合当前平台数据的保护需求。In the era of the digital economy,the value of data as the“oil of the 21st century”has captured widespread attention,especially the protection of platform data has caused fierce controversy.This thesis takes the current dilemma of platform data protection as the starting point and proposes that it is not appropriate to adopt the strong protection model of empowerment for platform data at the current stage through analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the empowerment model and liability rules.However,the competition law,as a liability rule with a“superposition of ternary interests”protection model,can judge the infringement of platform data on a case-by-case basis.Therefore,the competition law is undoubtedly more suitable for the current demand for platform data protection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33