检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Xiang You Tian Lijuan
机构地区:[1]School of Business Administration,Shenyang Pharmaceutical University,Shenyang 110016,China
出 处:《Asian Journal of Social Pharmacy》2021年第4期290-294,共5页亚洲社会药学(英文)
摘 要:Objective To put forward some suggestions for improving the procurement policy of Shenzhen Pharmaceutical Group.Methods The literature research and comparative research were used to compare the policies between Guangdong’s centralized drug procurement and Shenzhen Pharmaceutical Group’s procurement so as to analyze their advantages and disadvantages.Results and Conclusion The purchasing model of Shenzhen group purchasing organization(GPO)can ensure the timely supply of medicines.Besides,the cross-regional alliance system helps to achieve a true price-for-quantity exchange,and a market-based price linkage mechanism can effectively reduce drug prices.However,the online drug catalogue of Shenzhen GPO cannot fully cover the actual needs of hospitals for procurement.The market-based price linkage may lead to problems of drug quality or shortage of drugs.Therefore,the number of batches of drugs should be increased online appropriately.Meanwhile,a mechanism must be established to guarantee the supply and quality of low-priced drugs.
关 键 词:Shenzhen pharmaceutical group procurement Shenzhen GPO policy centralized drug procurement
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200