论江声对历史命题“微旨”的阐发  

Jiang Sheng’s Explanation of the Historical Proposition of“Wei Zhi”

作　　者：秦力[1] 钱宗武[1] QIN Li;QIAN Zong-wu(School of Chinese,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou,Jiangsu 225002,China)

机构地区：[1]扬州大学文学院,江苏扬州225002

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第6期159-168,共10页Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“《尚书》学文献集成与研究”(项目编号:12&ZD155)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：乾嘉时期,随着考据学兴起,学者们逐渐对微旨研究加以排斥。而作为以考据见长的乾嘉吴派学者,江声将从《春秋》学中诞生的历史命题“微旨”移用于《尚书》研究,并将微旨阐发作为经典诠释最重要的任务之一,显示出独特性。江声不仅重视《尚书》经文及旧注的微旨阐发,甚至在著作行文中也时时显示出对微旨的关照,在微旨的内涵、判断标准以及研究方法等方面均对前人研究有所突破,丰富了“微旨”的学术生命张力。他创造性地运用自注自疏的体式对微旨进行阐说,将文献考据与微旨阐发有机结合,表明“微旨”完全可以纳入乾嘉考据学研究范畴,一方面丰富了乾嘉汉学“由训诂以通义理”或“由词通道”的理论内涵;另一方面也为今文经学和古文经学的融合寻找到一个理想切入点。研究江声对历史命题“微旨”的阐释,不仅有助于深化乾嘉学术史研究,也能为乾嘉时期吴、皖古文学派与常州今文学派关系的研究乃至清中叶至晚清经学的学术嬗变研究提供新视角。During the Qianlong-Jiaqing Period of the Qing Dynasty,with the popularity of textual research,scholars gradually rejected the study of“Wei Zhi”.As a scholar of Qian-Jia School and Wu School,who was good at textual research,Jiang Sheng transferred the historical proposition of“Wei Zhi”born in the study of Spring and Autumn Annals to the study of The Book of History,and particularly took the interpretation of“Wei Zhi”as one of the most important tasks of classical interpretation to emphasize its uniqueness.Jiang Sheng not only attached great importance to the elucidation of“Wei Zhi”in the scriptures and ancient notes of The Book of History,but also showed his concern for“Wei Zhi”from time to time in his writing.He made a breakthrough in previous studies on the connotation,criteriaand research methods of“Wei Zhi”,and enriched the academic vitality of it.He creatively used the self-explanatory and self-sparse style to explain“Wei Zhi”,and organically combined the textual research of literature with the interpretation of“Wei Zhi”,indicating that“Wei Zhi”could be included in the research of Qian-Jia textual research.On the one hand,Jiang Sheng has enriched the theoretical connotation of“from exegesis to general justice”or“from words to Dao”proposed by Qian-Jia School.On the other hand,He has pointed out where the“jin wen”school of of Confucian classics and“gu wen”school Confucian classics can be merged with each other.Studying Jiang Sheng’s interpretation of the historical proposition“Wei Zhi”will not only help deepen the study of the academic history of Qianlong-Jiaqing Period,but also provide a new perspective for the study of the relationship between the gu wen schools,such as Wu and Anhui School,and that of jin wen,such as Changzhou School in Qianlong-Jiaqing Period,and even for the academic evolution of Confucian classics from the middle Qing Dynasty to the late Qing Dynasty.

关 键 词：经典微旨 江声 《尚书集注音疏》 乾嘉学派 

分 类 号：K221.04[历史地理—历史学]