继承、超越还是否定?--试析“新帝国主义论”与列宁帝国主义论的关系  

Inheritance,Transcendence or Negation?--an Analysis of the Relationship between “the Theory of New Imperialism”and Lenin's Imperialism

作　　者：刘维春[1] LIU Wei-chun(School of Marxism,Xi’an University,Xi’an 710065,China)

机构地区：[1]西安文理学院马克思主义学院,陕西西安710065

出　　处：《聊城大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第6期105-109,共5页Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金(17XKS031):列宁《帝国主义论》的当代价值研究;西安市社科基金“文理专项”重大课题(2018ZDZT01):习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的哲学底蕴与文本学解读。

摘　　要：“新帝国主义论”与列宁帝国主义论的关系如何?是继承,超越,还是否定?虽然“新帝国主义”理论被冠以“新”的名称,但并没有超越列宁关于帝国主义的研究水平,也没有走出资本主义的时代背景,而是在部分否定中扩宽了研究对象、研究内容和研究方法。“新帝国主义论”作为二战后的新理论延展了列宁帝国主义理论的研究空间,注重从历史、经济、国家等视角去认识发达与不发达的关系以及帝国主义霸权的根源,从而试图回答战后资本主义发展所带来的当代实证性难题。这也从一定程度上彰显了列宁帝国主义理论的当代价值。What is the relationship between “the theory of new imperialism”and Lenin’s imperialism?Inheritance,transcendence,or denial?Although“the theory of new imperialism”was named“new”,it did not surpass Lenin's research level on imperialism,nor go out of the era background of capitalism,but expanded the research object,research content and research methods in the partial denial.As a new theory after the Second World War,“the theory of new imperialism”extends the research space of Lenin’s imperialism theory,and focuses on understanding the relationship between developed and underdeveloped as well as the source of imperialist hegemony from the perspectives of history,economy and country,so as to try to answer the contemporary empirical problems brought by the development of postwar capitalism.This also demonstrates the contemporary value of Lenin's imperialism theory to a certain extent.

关 键 词：“新帝国主义论” 列宁 帝国主义 

分 类 号：A821[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]