检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:纪灵娴 Ji Lingxian(Jiangsu Nantong Environmental Monitoring Center,Nantong 226499,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏省南通环境监测中心,江苏南通226499
出 处:《黑龙江环境通报》2021年第4期17-19,共3页Heilongjiang Environmental Journal
摘 要:对沉积物中的硫化物测定方法—亚甲基蓝分光光度法和气相分子吸收光谱法进行对比研究,分析了气相法的校准曲线和方法检出限,对比了两种方法检测的精密度、准确度及加标回收率。研究表明,气相法分析土壤中的硫化物操作方便,曲线相关系数及精密度等测试能达到沉积物样品的分析要求,通过优化测定条件,可减少所需试剂用量,更好地完成大批量监测任务,为推广其在沉积物底质中的检测应用起到积极的作用。The methylene blue spectrophotometry and gas phase molecular absorption spectrometry for the determination of sulfide in sediments were compared,the calibration curve and detection limit of the gas phase method were analyzed,and the detection precision,accuracy and recovery of the two methods were compared.The research shows that the gas phase method is convenient to analyze sulfide in soil,and the test of curve correlation coefficient and precision can meet the analysis requirements of sediment samples.By optimizing the determination conditions,the required reagent dosage can be reduced,and the mass monitoring task can be better completed,which plays a positive role in popularizing its application in the detection of sediment sediment.
分 类 号:X830[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.103.248