认罪认罚从宽制度下量刑建议的契约化:架构、展开及限制  

The Contract of Sentencing Advice under the Lenient System of Guilty Plea and Punishment:Formation,Expansion and Restriction

作　　者：盛豪杰 行江[1] SHENG Haojie;XING Jiang(Law School,Anhui University,HeFei 230601,Anhui,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院,安徽合肥230601

出　　处：《昆明理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第6期10-18,共9页Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：安徽法治与社会安全研究中心重点项目“扫黑除恶背景下社会安全法治评估实证研究”(fzsh2018zd-4)。

摘　　要：量刑建议契约化将契约理论贯彻到量刑建议之中,以契约模型架构量刑建议的基本内容。量刑建议的契约化不仅符合提升司法效率的必要要求,而且其也体现了宽严相济刑事政策和罪刑责相适应原则的基本内涵。以契约理论为视角,量刑建议的主体必须处于平等地位,法院的生效裁判是量刑建议的生效条件,反悔权也是量刑建议双方主体的基本权利。量刑建议的契约化必须受到一定限制,完全的交易化与量刑建议制度的公法属性不相契合。对此,量刑建议必须采用幅度刑的量刑建议,量刑建议的成立中必须注重对被害人意见考虑,量刑建议主体反悔权的行使也必须有一定合理限制。The contract of sentencing advice carries out the contract theory into sentencing advice,and constructs the basic content of sentencing advice with contract model.Sentencing advice by contract not only helps improve the judicial efficiency of the necessary requirements,but also reflects the leniency and severity of the criminal policy adapting to the principle of the basic connotation.From the perspective of contract theory,the subject of sentencing advice should be in an equal position,the effective judgment of the court is the effective condition of sentencing advice,and the right of contrite is the basic right of both parties.There should be some restrictions on the contractual sentencing advice,and the complete private transaction cannot meet the public law nature of the sentencing advising system.To this end,sentencing advice should adopt a range of sentencing advice,take into account the establishment of the victim's opinion,and sentencing advice subject to the exercise of the right to regret must also be subject to a certain reasonable restrictions.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽制度 量刑建议 契约理论 公法属性 公平效率 

分 类 号：D924.11[政治法律—刑法学]