《山海经》文献疑误校证十则  

Ten Cases of Doubtful Proofreading in The Classic of Mountains and Seas

作　　者：贾雯鹤[1] JIA Wenhe(Institute of Mythology, Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Chengdu,Sichuan 610072)

机构地区：[1]四川省社会科学院神话研究院,四川成都610072

出　　处：《绵阳师范学院学报》2021年第12期115-119,共5页Journal of Mianyang Teachers＇ College

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“《山海经》汇校集释”(18BZW084)。

摘　　要：《山海经》作为我国先秦时期的一部典籍,具有重要的文献价值。典籍在流传过程中,会不断产生讹脱倒衍的文献错误,这些文献错误若不经校正,将会影响我们对典籍的准确使用。《山海经》同样包含不少的文献错误,影响了该书的使用价值。笔者对《山海经》及郭璞注的十处文献错误进行考正,尽量还原《山海经》的本来面貌,以为学界提供一个正确的文本。As a classic of the pre-Qin period of China,The Classic of Mountains and Seas(《山海经》)is a great document value.However,with the passage of time,classics often suffer from misinterpretations,omissions,deviances,and inversions which should be revised to ensure a correct use of the classics.This is the case of The Classic of Mountains and Seas,whose value would be undermined if these errors were not corrected.We make a textual research on ten mistakes in The Classic of Mountains and Seas and Guo Pu's notes to restore its original version as much as possible in the hope that a correct version can be available for the academe.

关 键 词：《山海经》 郭璞 文献 校勘 

分 类 号：G256.3[文化科学—图书馆学]