检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈立群[1] CHEN Liqun(Department of Thoracic Surgery,Jilin Provincial People's Hospital,Changchun Jilin 130021,China)
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2021年第22期141-144,共4页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的比较常规护理与联合护理干预对肺癌术后患者康复效果的影响。方法本次纳入76例患者,时间为2017年4月—2019年7月,患者信息输入Excel表格,采用随机投掷法分为对照组(常规护理,n=38)与试验组(联合护理干预,n=38)。对患者并发症发生率、护理满意度、住院时间所得数据进行处理分析。结果试验组并发症发生率5.26%,低于对照组的21.05%(P<0.05);试验组护理满意度97.37%,高于对照组的78.95%(P<0.05);试验组住院时间(11.24±1.26)d,短于对照组的(16.89±2.01)d(P<0.05)。结论联合护理干预对于肺癌患者术后康复具有实施价值。Objective To compare the effect of conventional nursing and combined nursing intervention on postoperative rehabilitation of patients with lung cancer.Methods A total of 76 patients were included in this study from April 2017 to July 2019.Patients'information was input into Excel,and patients were randomly divided into control group(routine nursing,n=38)and experimental group(combined nursing intervention,n=38)by throwing method.The data of complication rate,nursing satisfaction and length of hospital stay were processed and analyzed.Results The complication rate of experimental group was 5.26%,lower than 21.05%of control group(P<0.05).Nursing satisfaction of experimental group was 97.37%,higher than 78.95%of control group(P<0.05).The hospital stay of experimental group was(11.24±1.26)d,which was lower than(16.89±2.01)d of control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Combined nursing intervention has practical value for postoperative rehabilitation of lung cancer patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222