欧盟ISDS机制改革中的欧盟法挑战:欧盟法院的解释与启示  

Challenges of EU law in the reform of EU’s ISDS mechanism:interpretation by Court of Justice of the European Union and its enlightenment

作　　者：曹兴国[1] CAO Xing-guo(Law School,Dalian Maritime University,Dalian 116026,China)

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《中国海商法研究》2021年第4期29-38,共10页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law

基　　金：2021年度辽宁省哲学社会科学青年人才培养对象委托课题“自由贸易港(区)航运深化创新的政策与法律保障研究”(2022lslwkt-010)。

摘　　要：因欧盟法的自治性及其有关欧盟缔约权能的分配,欧盟有关投资者与东道国投资争端解决机制(ISDS机制)的改革面临欧盟法的挑战。欧盟法院对相关ISDS机制与欧盟法的兼容性判断,以及对欧盟在ISDS机制上缔约权限的澄清,一方面推动欧盟原有ISDS机制的退出和新机制的构建,另一方面也将增加后续ISDS机制缔约程序的复杂性,并带来对部分案件的适用争议。欧盟法院的实践也反映了ISDS机制中的国内法适用与解释难题,应当在仲裁庭对国内法体系的尊重和保持仲裁庭对国内法客观独立的适用和解释权之间寻求平衡。此外,国内法院在ISDS机制中的作用和参与也应被重视。Due to the autonomy of EU law and the competence of EU’s contracting power,EU’s reform against the Investor-State Dispute Settlement(ISDS)Mechanism faces challenges from EU law.The rulings and opinions of the Court of Justice of the European Union(CJEU)regarding the compatibility of relevant ISDS mechanism with EU law and the confirmation of EU’s power to conclude agreements on ISDS mechanism,constitute an important part of the EU’s reform of ISDS mechanism.These rulings and opinions on the one hand promote the replacement of EU’s formal ISDS mechanism and the construction of a new mechanism,on the other hand,increase the complexity of the follow-up approval procedure and bring disputes over the application of those cases.The practice of the CJEU reflects the issue of the application and interpretation of domestic law in the ISDS mechanism.Attention shall be paid to on how to keep a balance on the respect of the domestic law by the arbitral tribunal and the objective and independent right of application and interpretation of the domestic law by the arbitral tribunal.In addition,the role and participation of domestic courts in the ISDS mechanism shall also be emphasized.

关 键 词：欧盟法院 ISDS机制 欧盟法 国内法 国内法院 

分 类 号：D996.4[政治法律—经济法学]