检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孔凡义 程颖 Kong Fanyi;Cheng Ying(Wuhan University School of Maxism,Wuhan,Hubei 430072;School of Public Management,Zhongnan University of Economics and LAW,Wuhan,Hubei 430073)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学马克思主义学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]中南财经政法大学公共管理学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《重庆社会科学》2021年第12期58-68,共11页Chongqing Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“新生代农民工集体行动的政治心理机制及其调适研究”(16BZZ007)。
摘 要:涉诉信访在信访案件中占据比重较大。从国家权力运行来看,基层涉诉信访的产生与国家权力边界模糊和相互嵌入有一定的关系;从公民权利行使来看,访权和诉权重叠以及群众权利观的衍化催生着基层涉诉信访。以权力和权利关系为分析框架,我们可以清晰地观察到国家权力和公民权利的运行对基层涉诉信访的互相建构和强化。因此,基层涉诉信访法治化改革一方面需要明晰国家权力之间的治理边界和协作,另一方面需要把访权和诉权分离开来,塑造民众的公民权利观。Petitions related to lawsuits account for a large proportion in petition cases. From the perspective of state power, petitions related to lawsuits are the result of vague boundaries and mutual embedding of state powers. From the perspective of civil right, they are the derivation of the overlapping of petition rights and litigation rights and the concept of mass rights. Based on the analysis framework of the relationship between power and right, we can clearly observe the mutual construction and strengthening of state power and civil right in letters and visits related to lawsuits.Therefore, on the one hand, the reform of petitions related to lawsuits needs to clarify the governance boundaries between state powers;on the other hand, it needs to separate the petition rights and litigation rights, and shape the petitioners’ view of citizenship right.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3