论现代社会治理中的司法强制与当事人自治——以法院二元角色冲突与解决为切入点  

On Judicial Compulsion and Party Autonomy in Modern Social Governance——Taking the Conflict and Solution of the Court’s Dual Role as the Starting Point

作　　者：申琛 SHEN Chen(School of Law,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学法学院,北京102488

出　　处：《黑龙江社会科学》2021年第6期67-73,128,共8页Social Sciences in Heilongjiang

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“刑事诉讼中的财产权保护系统研究”(18ZDA144);北京市法学会重大课题“民事诉讼程序繁简分流”(BLS2020A005)。

摘　　要：在现代社会治理中,纠纷解决的社会需求期望法院不仅是司法裁判者,而且是多元化纠纷解决服务的提供者。但是,在纠纷解决过程中,这两个角色在价值取向上分别偏重于司法强制与当事人自治,进而产生二元角色的冲突。司法ADR制度作为ADR制度与司法制度的混合产物,在保留ADR程序灵活性、回应性特征的同时,又具备司法程序的制度化特征。分析和研究司法ADR程序技术对司法强制与当事人自治进行平衡,可以为法院二元角色冲突的解决提供更加具体和可操作的路径。In modern social governance,the social needs of dispute resolution expect the court to be not only a judge,but also a provider of diversified dispute resolution services.However,in the process of dispute resolution,these two roles focus on judicial coercion and party autonomy respectively in value orientation,resulting in the conflict of dual roles.As a mixed product of ADR system and judicial system,judicial ADR system not only retains the flexibility and responsiveness of ADR procedure,but also has the institutionalized characteristics of judicial procedure.The analysis and study of judicial ADR procedure technology and the balance between judicial coercion and party autonomy can provide a more specific and operable path for the settlement of the conflict of court dual roles.

关 键 词：社会治理 司法强制 当事人自治 司法ADR制度 

分 类 号：D916[政治法律—法学]