互联网异步审理方式法理定位论析  

An Analysis of the Legal Positioning of Asynchronous Trial Methods on the Internet

作　　者：党昭 Dang Zhao

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《南海法学》2021年第6期22-30,共9页The South China Sea Law Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“法治中国视阈下的司法与政治关系研究”(14BFX002)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：异步审理在时间维度、空间维度、角色维度与同步审理相比差异明显;与其它纠纷解决方式相比,在纠纷解决的终局性、程序启动的条件性、案件范围的有限性、与互联网技术的融合性方面也有所不同。“以审判为中心”的诉讼制度改革背景下,互联网异步审理无法替代同步审理满足庭审的功能要求,但与其他既有纠纷解决方式相比,其又因自身的独特性而实际成为一种新的纠纷解决方式。以系统论看待异步审理的现阶段定位,由于法律系统是封闭基础上开放运作的统一体,异步审理需要分担法律系统以同步审理为核心的纠纷解决压力,发挥科学技术的认知优势以提升法律系统对互联网的掌握能力,同时建立与司法规范的合理沟通维护自身的程序正当性。Asynchronous trial is significantly different from synchronous trial in time dimension,space dimension and role dimension;Compared with other dispute resolution methods,it is also different in the finality of dispute res⁃olution,the conditions of procedure initiation,the limitation of case scope and the integration with Internet technolo⁃gy.Under the background of"trial centered"litigation system reform,Internet asynchronous trial can not replace syn⁃chronous trial to meet the functional requirements of court trial,but compared with other existing dispute resolution methods,it has actually become a new dispute resolution method because of its own uniqueness.Look at the current positioning of asynchronous trial with system theory.Since the legal system is a unity of open operation on a closed basis,asynchronous trial needs to share the pressure of dispute resolution with synchronous trial as the core of the legal system,and give full play to the cognitive advantages of science and technology to improve the ability of the legal system to master the Internet.At the same time,establish reasonable communication with judicial norms to maintain its own procedural legitimacy.

关 键 词：异步审理 同步审理 纠纷解决方式 系统论 法理定位 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]