唐人制诰文本编纂及编次观——从制诰文本到制诰专集  

On the Compilation and Concept of Official Documents in Tang Dynasty——From Texts to Collections

作　　者：王冰慧 Wang Binghui

机构地区：[1]浙江大学人文学院,浙江杭州310030

出　　处：《南京师范大学文学院学报》2021年第4期153-163,共11页Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目《唐代文学制度与国家文明研究》(18JZD016)。

摘　　要：制诰文本存在模式有个逐渐转化的过程。文人属性是造成其变化的重要作用力。唐初,制诰多归于君主名下,主要保存在帝王别集、实录、起居注、宣底、个人留底等文本载体中,此时并无严格意义上的个人制诰集。自苏颋事后,制诰的编纂活动逐渐得到认可,制诰的文人属性得到肯定,并生成一套相对系统的编次原则。制诰编纂中,一级分类常“以体编次”,二级分类多“以类编次”。而至具体文本编次,则与制诰应用性有关,或以职能分类,或以功能分类,或以风格分类。当然,仍有部分制诰文本编纂并无相对固定的编次原则,这与文本的收集先后顺序、文本的类似性、个人的编纂习惯有关。The existence mode of official documents has a gradual transformation process.The literati attribute is the important force that causes its change.At the beginning of the Tang Dynasty,these official document unusually under the name of monarchs,mainly preserved in the emperors’anthologies,records,daily notes,scripts of edicts,personal record and so on.At this time,there is no strict sense of personal collection of imperial documents.Since Su Ting compiled the anthology,the compilation activities have been gradually recognized.As a result,a set of relatively systematic classification principles has been generated.The first level classification is often on the style,the second level is more on the category.As for the classification of the specific texts,it is related to their application,which may be classified according to function or style.Of course,there are still some official documents compilation without a fixed order principle,which is due to the sequence of collection,similarity of text and personal editing habits.

关 键 词：制诰 编纂 编次观 文本 文集 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]