精量电动弥粉机与电动喷雾器施药对比试验  

Contrast Test of Precision Electric Powder Grinder and Electric Sprayer

作　　者：朱宪良 卢涛 杜永贵 ZHU Xianliang;LU Tao;DU Yonggui(Qingdao Agricultural Technology Extension Center,Qingdao Shandong 266071,China;Jimo Agricultural Machinery Promotion Station,Qingdao Shandong 266299,China;Qingdao College of Enrollment and Examination,Qingdao Shandong 266108,China)

机构地区：[1]青岛市农业技术推广中心,山东青岛266071 [2]青岛市即墨区农机推广站,山东青岛266299 [3]青岛市招生考试院,山东青岛266108

出　　处：《农业工程》2021年第10期28-31,共4页AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING

基　　金：青岛市农技推广中心试验研究小项目“温室大棚高效植保机具引进”。

摘　　要：选择温室栽培的番茄,针对温室番茄霜霉病的防治,选用精量电动弥粉机和电动喷雾器进行施药,开展防效及农药利用率的对比试验,对比验证精量电动弥粉机与电动喷雾器的作业性能,优选适合温室施药的高效植保机具。经过试验,精量电动弥粉机与电动喷雾器相比,农药利用率提升了31.7%,施药效率提升了20倍,防治效果提升了13.2%。Selecting tomato for greenhouse cultivation,according to prevention and control of tomato downy mildew,precision electric powder grinder and electric sprayer were chosen to carry out pesticide application,a comparative experiment of control efficiency and pesticide utilization rate was carried out,performance of precision electric powder grinder and electric sprayer were compared and verified,and highly effective plant protection equipment suitable for greenhouse spraying was selected.After testing,precision electric powder grinder compared with electric sprayer,pesticide utilization rate increased by 31.7%,spraying efficiency increased by 20 times,and control effect increased by 13.2%.

关 键 词：植保机械 精量电动弥粉机 电动喷雾器 效率 利用率 药效 

分 类 号：S49[农业科学—植物保护]