数字贸易谈判背景下的个人信息保护行业自律规范构建研究  

The Construction of Self-regulation of Personal Information Protection Under the Background of Digital Trade Talks

作　　者：赵海乐[1] ZHAO Hai-le

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院

出　　处：《国际经贸探索》2021年第12期101-112,共12页International Economics and Trade Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA136);吉林大学劳动关系专项研究课题(2021LD010)。

摘　　要：对个人信息保护的行业自律问题进行研究,不仅有助于理解美欧个人信息保护模式的差异进而便利数字贸易谈判,也有助于我国个人信息保护规则的完善。美国个人信息保护行业自律的制度构建包括行业主导下的规则制定,同时也包括政府主导下的行业自律规则执行监督与行政、司法救济。监督与执行机制是个人信息保护行业自律模式产生约束力的关键。美国在区域贸易协定谈判当中,则极力推进行业自律为主线的APEC跨境隐私规则机制作为数据跨境流动的充分条件。对我国而言,有必要澄清自律规则在司法实践当中的法律地位。同时,我国在区域贸易协定缔约当中可以接受与我国个人信息保护本质相同的他国规则体系,但应注意对其可执行性进行评估,以保障数据跨境流动的安全进行。The study of self-regulation of personal information protection not only helps to understand the differences of personal information protection modes between the United States and the European Union so as to facilitate digital trade talks,but also helps to improve personal information protection rules in China.The construction of self-regulation of personal information protection of the Unites States includes both the sector-led rule making and the government-led monitoring and remedies,which is also the foundation of the enforceability of self-regulation.In the negotiation of regional trade agreements,the United States strives to promote CBPR mechanism of the APEC as the sufficient condition for cross-border data flow.For China,it is necessary to clarify the legal status of self-regulation rules in judicial practice.At the same time,China can accept personal information protection rules of other countries which are essentially equivalent to China’s counterpart in FTA negotiations,but it is sensible to evaluate their enforceability in order to ensure the safety of cross-border data flow.

关 键 词：个人信息保护 行业自律 数字贸易谈判 数据跨境流动 

分 类 号：D996[政治法律—经济法学]