检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:向翀 李小申[1] 孙广磊 XIANG Chong;LI Xiaoshen;SUN Guanglei(School of Mathematics and Statistics,Henan University of Science and Technology,Luoyang 471003,Henan,China;School of Information Engineering,Henan University of Science and Technology,Luoyang 471003,Henan,China)
机构地区:[1]河南科技大学数学与统计学院,河南洛阳471003 [2]河南科技大学信息与工程学院,河南洛阳471003
出 处:《运筹学学报》2021年第4期45-57,共13页Operations Research Transactions
基 金:国家自然科学基金(Nos.12071112,11471102);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(No.20ZX001)。
摘 要:本文考虑碳税政策下一个生产型企业生产和销售的选址问题。消费者分布在一条直线上,运输成本是线性的,企业除承担自身产品的运输费用外还承担消费者的运输成本。本文建立了利润最大化模型,分析了利润函数的性质,给出了求解方法。通过数值实验证明了求解方法的有效性,同时得出,即使消费者分布是中心对称的,最优的选址也不一定中心对称,这纠正了人们的错觉。增加碳税可使销售点靠近自己的消费者,增加企业的费用,但不一定起到减排的作用,只有通过灵活的碳税政策才有可能达到减排的目的。This paper considers a location problem of production and sales of a production-oriented enterprise under carbon tax policy.Consumers are distributed on a straight line with linear transportation costs.In addition to pay the transportation costs of its own products,the enterprise is also responsible for the transportation costs of consumers.A profit maximization model is established,properties of the profit function are analyzed,and a solving method is given.Numerical experiments prove the effectiveness of the solving method.They show that even if the distribution of consumers is centersymmetric,the optimal location is not necessarily center-symmetric,which corrects the illusion of people.Increasing carbon tax drives the retailers approach their respective customers,increases the enterprise’s cost,but may not reduce the carbon emission,which may achieve only by flexible carbon tax policy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127