检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜娇 Jiang Jiao(School of Law,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China)
出 处:《政法学刊》2021年第5期43-52,共10页Journal of Political Science and Law
基 金:湖南省人民检察院检察理论研究课题“未成年人涉网司法保护制度研究”(XJ2020C27)。
摘 要:新时代背景下规制网络失范言论需要刑法的积极应对。对网络失范言论的刑法规制应当首先在规范层面厘定刑法所禁止的失范言论与未禁止的失范言论,在现有的刑法体系中思考网络言论型犯罪的治理思路。在立法层面,对网络失范言论的规制需进一步扩宽治理范围,完善对虚假信息的规制样态,同时也需注重对网络空间言论寻衅滋事司法规则与立法规则的衔接;在司法层面,需坚持言论犯罪治理的谦抑性,注重言论犯罪认定标准的类型化,创新言论犯罪的办案机制。In the context of the new era,the regulation of network anomie speech needs to be actively dealt with by the criminal law.The criminal law regulation of the network anomie speech should first determine the anomie speech prohibited by the criminal law and the unprohibited anomie speech at the normative level,and think about the governance ideas of the network discourse crime in the existing criminal law system.At the legislative level,the regulation of network anomie speech needs to further broaden the scope of governance,improve the regulation of false information,and pay attention to the connection between judicial rules and legislative rules of speech in cyberspace.At the judicial level,it is necessary to adhere to the modesty of the governance of speech crime,pay attention to the classification of the identification standard of speech crime,and innovate the case-handling mechanism of speech crime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.185.100