检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘鲁[1] 吴必虎[2] Liu Lu;Wu Bihu(Institute of Tourism,Beijing Union University,Beijing 100101,China;College of Urban and Environment Science,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
机构地区:[1]北京联合大学旅游学院,北京100101 [2]北京大学城市与环境学院,北京100871
出 处:《地理科学》2021年第11期1897-1906,共10页Scientia Geographica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(42001168,41871138)资助。
摘 要:城市溢出和景区辐射是乡村发展的重要力量,已有研究对城市周边和景区附近区位下"城市-景区"双驱动乡村的发展路径探索较少。以北京市怀柔区慕田峪村、北沟村、田仙峪村和辛营村4个行政村共同组成的"长城国际文化村"为案例地,探索城市和景区双重优势驱动下的乡村发展路径选择及其动态演化过程。研究发现:(1)城市、景区和乡村自身等多元力量共同驱动乡村发展,继而导致其发展路径呈现出非线性、多元化的演变特征;(2)"城市-景区"双驱动型乡村的发展路径可分为"景区主导-城市辅助""城市-景区并重驱动""城市主导-景区辅助"和"城市-景区双重弱驱动"4种类型;(3)"城市-景区"双驱型乡村发展竞争性路径随着城乡、景乡间要素的差异化集聚引发了乡村产业结构变动及区域空间格局演化。The urban overflow and scenic transformation are important forces for rural development. There have been few studies on the development path of ‘city-scenic’ dual-driven rural development in the surrounding areas of cities and scenic spots. In this paper, four administrative villages in the ‘Great Wall International Cultural Villages’ in the Huairou District in Beijing were selected as the sites for the case study, including Mutianyu Village, Tianxianyu Village, Beigou Village, and Xinying Village. to explore the path selection and dynamic evolution process of rural development under the dual advantages of cities and scenic spots. The results are as fellows: first, the multiple forces of cities, scenic spots and villages jointly drive the development and evolution of rural development path, presenting a non-linear and diverse characteristic. The development of these villages within the same area differentiates into different dynamic transformation process. It also forms a development path of regional differentiation. Secondly, urban-scenic dual-drive rural development paths are roughly classified into four modes: urban-led development path, scenic-led development path, dual-led development path, and marginal development path. Urban-rural relationship and industrial structure under different paths show significant differences. Third, the competitive path of ‘city-scenic’ dual-drive rural development has led to changes in the rural industrial structure and the evolution of regional spatial patterns along with the differentiated agglomeration of urban, rural, and scenic rural elements. The study helps to reveal the multi-path system of ‘city-scenic’ dual-driven rural development, and provides strategic plans for optimizing the path practice of rural development.
关 键 词:“城市-景区”双驱动 乡村发展 城市溢出 景区辐射 长城国际文化村
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33