检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李松杰 LI Song-jie(Law School,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610207,China)
机构地区:[1]四川大学法学院,成都610207
出 处:《西南政法大学学报》2021年第6期122-132,共11页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
摘 要:当前,互联网法院在运行中存在的问题很大程度上来源于对其定位不明。通说认为,互联网法院属于专门人民法院范畴。在我国,设立专门人民法院主要是从治理因素、依托因素、服务因素、整合因素等多方面进行考量。由此,我国专门人民法院在发展过程中形成了为满足管理特定领域需要、管辖范围多跨行政区划、专门管辖等特征。因互联网法院不具备前述特征,其不应被视为专门人民法院,而应被看作专业化审判机构的一种。明确互联网法院专业化审判机构的属性、定位、功能能够厘清互联网法院发展中的障碍,更好地发挥其审判机构优势。At present,the predicament in the operation of the Internet Court is largely derived from its unclear positioning.It is believed that the Internet courts belong to the category of special people’s court.In China,the establishment of specialized people’s courts is mainly considered in terms of governance factors,reliance factors,service factors and integration factors.As a result,China’s specialized people’s courts have formed in the process of development to meet the needs of specific areas of management,jurisdiction across administrative divisions,specialized jurisdiction and other features.As the Internet Court does not possess the aforementioned characteristics,it should not be regarded as a specialized people’s court,but rather as a type of specialized judicial institution.By clarifying the attributes,positioning and functions of the specialized judiciary of the Internet Court,the obstacles in the development of the Internet Court can be clarified and its advantages as a judiciary can be better utilized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49