针灸学理论体系的三种范式与各自的疆界——交叉学科研究推动了针灸学理论体系的变革  

Three Paradigms of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Theory System and Their Respective Boundaries:The Reform Promotion of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Theory System by Interdisciplinary Research

作　　者：陈少宗[1] 巩昌镇 CHEN Shao-zong;GONG Chang-zhen(Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion,Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jinan 250355,China)

机构地区：[1]山东中医药大学针灸研究院,山东济南250355 [2]美国中医学院,美国罗斯威尔55113

出　　处：《医学与哲学》2021年第22期70-72,共3页Medicine and Philosophy

基　　金：2019年国家重点研发计划资助项目(2019YFC1712105);2018年山东中医药大学科研创新基金资助项目(2018-220315)。

摘　　要：随着交叉学科研究的不断拓展,在传统针灸学理论体系之外又发展出了现代针灸学理论体系以及后现代针灸学理论体系(系统针灸学理论体系)两种不同的范式。传统范式是传统文化背景下的理论体系;现代范式则是完全建立在还原论背景下的现代认知体系。后现代范式则是运用整体的、动态的、定量的或定量与定性相结合的系统科学研究方法所建立的体系。这三种范式各有自己独特的探索角度,在核心理论方面既没有内在的逻辑关系,也不存在相互否定的问题,各自具有自己发挥作用的疆界。With the continuous expansion of interdisciplinary research,two different paradigms,modern acupuncture and moxibustion theory system and post-modern acupuncture and moxibustion theory system(systematic acupuncture and moxibustion theory system),have been developed.Traditional paradigm is a theoretical system under the background of traditional culture.Modern paradigm is a modern cognitive system completely based on reductionism.Post-modern paradigm is a system established by using the overall,dynamic,quantitative or the combination of quantitative and qualitative systematic scientific research methods.Each of the three paradigms has unique exploration angle of its own,and there is no inherent logical relationship in the core theory and no question of mutual negation.Each has its own boundary to work.

关 键 词：现代针灸学 现代范式 交叉学科研究 

分 类 号：R2-03[医药卫生—中医学]