“西周封建说”首创之问题探析——关涉吕振羽、范文澜和吴玉章之学术影响  

On the Initiators of “the Doctrine of the Feudal Western Zhou Dynasty”:A Study of the Academic Influence of Mr.Lü Zhenyu,Mr.FAN Wenlan and Mr.WU Yuzhang

作　　者：李勇[1] LI Yong(Huaibei Normal University,Huaibei 235000,China)

机构地区：[1]淮北师范大学史学理论与史学史研究中心、历史文化旅游学院,淮北235000

出　　处：《云南大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期83-90,共8页The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“现代中国马克思主义史学文献的调查、整理和研究(1900—1949)”(项目号:18ZDA169)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：在"西周封建说"首创问题上,学术界存在着的一些模糊认识有待澄清。吕振羽从马克思主义社会形态学角度提出"西周封建说"之时,人们对于"封建"的流行认识还停留在传统意义之上。可是,由于范文澜的地位和威望高于吕振羽,后来其关于"西周封建说"的论述也更为系统,因此学界从马克思主义社会形态学角度讨论"西周封建说"皆以范文澜为代表。范文澜在"西周封建说"问题上推崇吴玉章,造成是吴玉章首创"西周封建说"的印象。即使说是吴玉章提出"西周封建说",那也应是在吕振羽之后。同时,说吴玉章受到吕振羽的影响,则还需作更为深入和细致的探讨。Chinese scholars hold some controversies about the initiators of “the Doctrine of the Feudal Western Zhou Dynasty”,which deserves clarification.When Mr.Lü Zhenyu proposed “the Doctrine of the Feudal Western Zhou Dynasty” from the perspective of social morphology of Marxism,many others till understood the word “feudal” in the traditional meaning.Because Mr.Fan Wenlan had a higher academic status and prestige and his interpretation was more systematic,the academia have usually regarded Mr.Fan Wenlan as the representative in this aspect.Though Mr.Fan Wenlan thought highly of Mr.WU Yuzhang,the latter?s view of the Feudal Western Zhou Dynasty was proposed later than Mr.Lü Zhenyu?s.Whether Mr.WU Yuzhang was under the influence of Mr.Lü Zhenyu needs further detailed studies.

关 键 词：“西周封建说” 马克思主义社会形态学 吕振羽 范文澜 吴玉章 

分 类 号：K207[历史地理—历史学]