明清之际封建郡县之辨的三种模式及其意义  

Three Models and Their Significance of the Distinction between Feudal System and County System during the Late Ming and Early Qing Period

作　　者：韩书安 Han Shu’an

机构地区：[1]浙江大学哲学学院

出　　处：《政治思想史》2021年第4期61-74,197,198,共16页Journal of the History of Political Thought

摘　　要：明清之际的封建郡县之辨有三种典型论述模式:一是"回向三代"的复古派,着眼周制与秦制的政体之辨,强调"非封建不能尽天下人民之治";二是"经世致用"的折中派,关注集权与分权的治道之辨,主张"寓封建之意于郡县之中";三是"理势相成"的厚今派,侧重势异与理异的天人之辨,指出郡县"合古今上下皆安之"。尽管这三种模式在论说方式上各有不同,但都触及了中国传统政治的根本症结。There were three typical modes of discussion on the distinction between feudal system and county system during the late Ming and early Qing period.Firstly,the Fugu school of"back to Three Dynasties",which focused on the difference between the Zhou system and the Qin system,emphasized that"it cannot govern all the people under the world without feudal system".Secondly,the Zhezhong school of"emphasizing statecraft",which paid attention to the difference between centralization and decentralization,advocated that"incorporating feudal meaning in county system".Thirdly,the Houjin school of"unifying Li and Shi",which laid stress on the difference between the changing of Li and Shi,pointed out that county system was"in harmony with ancient times and present times".Although these three modes had different ways of argument,they all touched the fundamental crux of Chinese traditional politics.

关 键 词：明清之际 封建郡县之辨 复古派 折中派 厚今派 

分 类 号：K248[历史地理—历史学] D691.2[历史地理—中国史]