浅谈国际刑事法院的管辖权问题  被引量:1

On the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:周星越 ZHOU Xing-yue(School of Criminal Law,Northwest University of Political Science and Law, Xi’an 710000, China)

机构地区:[1]西北政法大学刑事法学院,西安710000

出  处:《唐山学院学报》2022年第1期63-72,共10页Journal of Tangshan University

摘  要:《罗马规约》以及相关文书的生效,表明国际刑事法院正式成立,其满足了二战以来国际社会对于惩治严重威胁人类和平与安全的违法犯罪的要求。但同时国际刑事法院管辖权在实际运行中存在着公正性受质疑、国际认可度不足、安理会干预和执行困难等问题,需要进一步完善。文章结合国际刑事法院管辖权运行的现实境地,对国际刑事法院管辖权补充性、自动性、有限性与普遍性等属性和管辖权效力范围等方面进行探讨,以阐明国际刑事法院管辖权面临的困境,明确我国目前对于《罗马规约》的态度和立场,并提出国际刑事法院管辖权的本土化确立进路。The entry into force of the Rome Statute and the relevant instruments indicates the formal establishment of the International Criminal Court(ICC),which has met the international community’s requirements for punishing crimes that seriously threaten the peace and security of mankind since the Second World War.But at the same time,in the actual operation of the jurisdiction of this court,there are some problems,such as doubt of impartiality,lack of international recognition,intervention of the Security Council and difficulties in implementation,which need to be further improved.Based on the actual operation of its jurisdiction,this paper discusses the jurisdiction scope and jurisdiction attributes such as being complementary,automatic,finite and universal,so as to illustrate the plight of the jurisdiction for the International Criminal Court,to make China’s current attitude and position on joining the Rome statute clear,and then puts forward localized approach for its jurisdiction.

关 键 词:国际刑事法院 管辖权 中国立场 罗马规约 

分 类 号:D997.9[政治法律—刑法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象