检察机关打击虚假仲裁的现实必要性与程序设计  

Practical Necessity and Procedural Design of Procuratorial Organs to Crack Down on False Arbitration

作　　者：胡思博[1] 李英辉 Hu Sibo;Li Yinghui

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院、检察基础理论研究基地,北京100088 [2]河南省法学会办公室,郑州450003

出　　处：《中州学刊》2021年第12期57-61,共5页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou

基　　金：北京市社会科学青年基金项目“对虚假仲裁的查明与规制”(18FXC017);中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队项目“对行为请求权的强制执行”(20CXTD06)。

摘　　要：虚假仲裁的出现对仲裁公信力的提升带来破坏性影响,对此,有必要在诉讼检察监督的基础上发展非诉检察监督的理念和方式,通过对虚假仲裁裁决的检察监督制度创新,帮助和促进正常仲裁环境的恢复。在具体程序上,可由案外第三人向检察机关申请启动检察监督,检察机关制发检察建议,仲裁机构责令仲裁庭在虚假仲裁进行中予以识别和叫停,或者对虚假仲裁裁决进行审查后予以撤销。The emergence of false arbitration has a destructive impact on the improvement of the credibility of arbitration.Therefore,it is necessary to develop the concept and mode of non-litigation procuratorial supervision on the basis of litigation prosecutorial supervision,which could help and promote the restoration of the normal arbitration environment by innovating the procuratorial supervision system of false arbitration awards.In terms of specific procedures,the third party outside the case may apply to the procuratorial organ for the initiation of procuratorial supervision and the procuratorial organ shall formulate and issue procuratorial suggestions.Then the arbitration organ shall order the arbitration tribunal to identify and stop the false arbitration in progress,or cancel the false arbitration award after reviewing.

关 键 词：虚假仲裁 检察监督 检察建议 仲裁机构 

分 类 号：D926.34[政治法律—法学]