目的解释方法在指导性行政案例中的司法适用与完善  

Judicial Application and Perfection of Purpose Interpretation Method in Guiding Administrative Cases

作　　者：缪海伦 MIAO Hai-lun(East China University of Political Science and Law,Changning 200000,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海长宁200000

出　　处：《江西电力职业技术学院学报》2021年第10期166-168,共3页Journal of Jiangxi Vocational and Technical College of Electricity

摘　　要：在指导性行政案例中目的解释方法运用广泛,但法官在运用目的解释方法时尚未形成标准,有关目的性扩张与目的性限缩的论述存在逻辑瑕疵。因此,建议在运用目的解释方法时遵循文义优先的原则,同时引入行政法的比例原则,构建比例原则运用的宽严基准,促进裁判说理更加精细。Purpose interpretation methods are widely used in guiding administrative cases, but judges have not yet formed a standard when using purpose interpretation methods, and there are logical flaws in the discussion of purpose expansion and purpose restriction. Therefore, it is recommended to follow the principle of literal priority when using the purpose interpretation method, and at the same time introduce the principle of proportionality in administrative law to construct a leniency and strict benchmark for the application of the principle of proportionality, and promote more refined reasoning in the judgment.

关 键 词：目的解释 比例原则 目的性扩张 目的性限缩 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]