检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李声高 Li Shenggao
机构地区:[1]宁波大学法学院 [2]浙江省新型重点专业智库宁波大学东海研究院,浙江宁波315211
出 处:《南京社会科学》2021年第12期99-108,共10页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
摘 要:人格权入编《民法典》,对民事执行治理产生了双重影响。尊严型人格权和自由型人格权逐步倚重,失信惩戒的执行威慑力对应削减。在"法法衔接"的背景下,一方面要强调执行威慑程序中的人格权保障,另一方面也要研究人格权在执行治理当中的法治限度。通过建构以威慑标准和人格权保障为各自主线的双层救济机制和法治限度规则,从程序规则上实现实体人格利益的让渡,由量入质逐步实现执行治理的善治,以期破解执行司法痼疾。The incorporation of personality right into the civil code has a dual impact on the governance of civil execution.The dignity type personality right and the freedom type personality right gradually rely on,and the deterrence of the implementation of dishonesty punishment is correspondingly reduced.Under the background of “connection between law and law”,on the one hand,we should emphasize the protection of personality right in the implementation deterrence procedure,on the other hand,we should also study the rule of law limit of personality right in the implementation governance.By constructing a two-tier relief mechanism and rule of law limit rule with deterrence standard and personality right guarantee as their main line,we can realize the transfer of entity personality interests from procedural rules,and gradually realize the good governance of executive governance from quantity to quality,in order to solve the chronic disease of executive justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200