检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:甘勇[1] GAN Yong(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,Hubei,Chin)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院/国际法研究所,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2021年第6期83-91,共9页Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“国际私法视域下中国法域外适用的制度构建研究”(20&ZD203);武汉大学人文社会科学自主科研项目(413000310);中央高校基本科研业务费项目。
摘 要:美国最高法院“深南包装公司”案判决导致美国国会立法明确规定了美国专利法的域外适用。美国专利法的损害赔偿条款可否赔偿外国损失,美国最高法院在维森盖克案中作出了肯定回答。由于缺乏对损害赔偿条款能否域外适用的深入分析,导致该案之后,美国法院针对无论国内还是国外的侵权行为,都可以允许赔偿国外损失,美国专利法的域外适用已经突破专利法的地域性成为不可逆转的法律现象。中国也面临着专利法一定条件下应该域外适用的需要,我国过去的专利司法实践表明,我国专利法应该域外适用,对出口侵权设备部件的行为,以及进口侵犯中国专利权产品等间接侵权行为给予规范。While the decision of the U.S.Supreme Court on Deepsouth Packing Co.prompted the U.S.Congress to legislate expressly for the extraterritorial application of the U.S.Patent Act,the decision of the Supreme Court in WesternGeco gave an affirmative answer with respect to whether the damage clauses in the Patent Act could apply to foreign economic loss.However,because the Supreme Court decision in WesternGeco failed to conduct an in-depth analysis why the damage clause should apply overseas,the U.S.courts now are inclined to allow all the compensation based on both domestic and foreign loss of profit,regardless whether the infringing acts take place within the U.S.or without,which shows that the application of the Patent Act has overcome the territoriality principle.China also faces the need of applying its patent law abroad under certain circumstances.The past judicial practices regarding the patent law in China demonstrated that Chinese patent law should also apply abroad with respect to exporting parts of infringed devices and importing products infringing Chinese patents.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3