检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:管玉华 GUAN Yuhua(No.1 Department of Orthopedics,Chaoyang Central Hospital,Chaoyang 122000,China)
机构地区:[1]朝阳市中心医院骨外一科,辽宁朝阳122000
出 处:《中国医药指南》2022年第1期95-97,共3页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的观察不同手术方案治疗掌指骨骨折的临床效果差异。方法选择60例掌指骨骨折患者。按照手术方案差异分为对照组(克氏针内固定,30例)及观察组(微型钢板内固定,30例)。比较两组患者TAFS评级优良率、放射学评估优良率、并发症发生率、术后恢复耗时差异性。结果对照组TAFS评级优良率为73.33%,观察组优良率为93.33%,差异有显著性(P<0.05);对照组放射学评估优良率为76.67%,观察组为96.67%,差异有显著性(P<0.05);对照组并发症总发生率为43.33%,观察为16.67%,差异有显著性(P<0.05);对照组术后恢复平均耗时(64.28±6.34)d,观察组平均(53.97±5.92)d,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论掌指骨骨折采用微型钢板内固定治疗,在TAFS评级、放射学评估、并发症控制、术后恢复方面相较于克氏针内固定方案更具优势。Objective To observe the difference of clinical effects of different surgical schemes in the treatment of metacarpal and phalanx fractures.Methods Sixty patients with metacarpal and phalanx fractures were selected.The patients were divided into control group(Kirschner wire internal fixation,30 cases)and observation group(micro plate internal fixation,30 cases)according to the difference of surgical plan.The differences of TAFS rating rate,radiological evaluation rate,complication rate and postoperative recovery time between the two groups were compared.Results The excellent rate of TAFS rating was 73.33%in the control group and 93.33%in the observation group,the difference was singnificant(P<0.05).The excellent and good rate of radiological evaluation was 76.67%in the control group and 96.67%in the observation group,the difference was singnificant(P<0.05).The total incidence of complications was 43.33%in the control group and 16.67%in the observation group,the difference was singnificant(P<0.05).The average recovery time of the control group was(64.28±6.34)days,and that of the observation group was(53.97±5.92)days,the difference was singnificant(P<0.05).Conclusion The treatment of metacarpal and phalanx fractures with micro-plate internal fixation has more advantages than kirschner wire internal fixation in TAFS rating,radiological evaluation,complication control and postoperative recovery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15