汉语保留宾语结构的施用操作分析  

An Applicative Study on the Retained Object Constructions in Chinese

作　　者：全峰 韩景泉[2] Quan Feng;Han Jing-quan(College of Foreign Studies,Guilin University of Electronic Technology,Guilin 541004,China;Faculty of English Language and Culture,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 510420,China)

机构地区：[1]桂林电子科技大学外国语学院,桂林541004 [2]广东外语外贸大学英语语言文化学院,广州510420

出　　处：《外语学刊》2021年第6期30-36,共7页Foreign Language Research

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“英汉语句法与语义接口的对比研究”(18AYY002);教育部人文社科基金项目“生成语言学视域下汉语双宾句的句法生成机制研究”(18YJC740079);广西壮族自治区哲学社科基金“广西汉语方言双宾语结构的生成语言学研究”(18FYY008);第68批中国博士后科学基金“类型学视域下广西汉语方言双及物结构的比较研究”(2020M683166);桂林电子科技大学国家社科基金培育项目(UP17006Y)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：本文讨论"部分格说""格传递说"的问题点,并提出领有名词具有主语属性,隶属名词被赋予宾格的观点。在施用操作下,领有名词由施用中心语指派题元,隶属名词由施用中心语赋格,因此汉语保留宾语结构并不是一个句法特例,其生成机制符合"题元角色准则""格理论"以及"非宾格假说"等普遍语法原则。此外,施用操作还为句末焦点提供一个合理的句法结构位置,即施用中心语的标志语位置。This paper discusses the problems of the previous account that is based on partitive Case or Case transmission, and argues that the possessor NP shares the property of the subject and the postverbal NP is assigned accusative Case. Under the applicative analysis, the applicative head plays the role of assigning theta-role to the possessor NP and accusative Case to the postverbal NP, indicating that retained object constructions in Chinese, which conform to the Universal Grammar theories, such as Theta-crite-rion, Case Theory, Unaccusative Hypothesis, are not idiosyncratic phenomena. The applicative analysis also provides a more reasonable syntactic position for the end focus, namely the specifier position of the applicative head.

关 键 词：汉语保留宾语结构 施用结构 施用中心语 名词赋格 句末焦点 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]