投资条约仲裁中法庭之友的局限性及其改进  

Limitations of Amicus Curiae in Investment Treaty Arbitration and Its Perfection

作　　者：杜焕芳[1] 郭诗雅 DU Huanfang;GUO Shiya(Law School,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《浙江工商大学学报》2021年第6期46-57,共12页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国特色社会主义对外关系法律体系构建研究”(19ZDA167)。

摘　　要：全球行政法理论要求投资条约仲裁应当具备问责、透明和公众参与、阐明理由及复审程序,其中法庭之友作为公众参与的主要方式影响有限,申请人是否适格、能否参与和表达、表达能否被接受完全属于仲裁庭的自由裁量范围。法庭之友的广泛参与、有效表达和及时反馈是全球行政法理论下投资条约仲裁的应有之义,完善法庭之友对于国际投资条约仲裁走出合法性危机具有重大意义。结合仲裁规则和最新投资协定相关规则,完善法庭之友规则应明确法庭之友的主要审查标准,降低身份、重大利益关系、程序负担等次要标准对法庭之友广泛参与的限制;形成以披露信息、申诉方和被申诉方意见,仲裁庭意见为主要内容的有效反馈模板;通过限定篇幅、允许联合声明、规定时限等方式加强程序控制。According to the theory of global administrative law,accountability,transparency,public participation,justification and review procedure are indispensable elements of investment treaty arbitration.As a main way of public participation,amicus curiae,however,has limited influence on existing practices.Whether the applicant is qualified,whether he or she can participate and express,and whether the expression can be accepted completely are entirely at the discretion of the arbitral tribunals.In order to improve the legitimacy of investment treaty arbitration,the rules and procedure of amicus curiae need to be modified under the theory of global administrative law.In combination with the arbitration rules and the relevant rules of the latest investment agreement,to improve the amicus curiae rules,we should clarify the main review standards of amicus curiae and reduce the restrictions on the extensive participation of amicus curiae by secondary standards such as identity,major interest relationship and procedural burden;we should formulate an effective feedback template,i.e.introduction,information disclosure,observations of the complainant and the respondent,and conclusion;and we should use procedural control tools by limiting length,allowing joint statements,and setting the time limit,etc.

关 键 词：投资仲裁 全球行政法 法庭之友 公众参与 有效反馈 

分 类 号：D996.4[政治法律—经济法学]