检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄艳敏[1] 李春晓 HUANG Yan-min;LI Chun-xiao(School of Management,Tianjin University of Technology,Tianjin 300384,China)
出 处:《华南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第1期54-66,共13页Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71774114)。
摘 要:引入前景理论关于福利的解构思想,构建主观福利视角的相对贫困考察模式。首次将社会偏好理论植入相对贫困领域,以不平等厌恶偏好为切入点构建内生化减贫模式。采用CGSS2017数据,测算贫困发生率以及贫困缺口指数,识别中国农村居民主观福利相对贫困状况。运用Logit分析相对贫困广度,发现:不平等厌恶偏好具有诱发相对精神贫困的直接效应;且与收入、教育和健康交互作用于相对贫困广度,展现出调节效应。采用OLS分析相对贫困深度揭示:不平等厌恶偏好正向贡献偏离相对贫困线的贫困缺口指数;通过收入、教育和健康等途径调节相对贫困缺口倾向。The theory of social preference has been introduced into the relative poverty of subjective well-being(RPSW), and inequality aversion is regarded as the endogenous impetus to escape the relative poverty. Based on CGSS2017 date, calculate poverty incidence and poverty gap index, to analyze RPSW. Logit is applied to estimate the breadth of relative poverty. We found that inequality aversion may directly contribute to RPSW, and moderate the RPSW by the way of the objective well-being, including income, education and health status. Inequality aversion preference departure from poverty gap index with positive contribution, and regulate with income, education and health status. Therefore, it’s the key endogenous path for the reduction of RPSW that the positive belief of inequality aversion should be nudged when rural residents’ subjective well-being have been improving.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15