美国两党政治话语中的家庭道德观——基于三届总统竞选演讲语料的实证研究  

Family moral models in political discourses of American Parties——An empirical study based on a corpus of candidates’ speeches in three American presidential elections

作　　者：易保树 YI Baoshu(Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Nanjing 210023,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]南京邮电大学外国语学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《外国语言文学》2021年第5期475-487,558,559,共15页Foreign Language and Literature Studies

基　　金：南京邮电大学人才引进基金项目(NYY219017);国社科重点项目“回应突发舆情政务微博话语及政务语言能力建设研究”(20AYY009)。

摘　　要：本文借助语料库来分析美国三届总统竞选演讲辞中的隐喻使用情况,检验民主党和共和党是否具有不同的家庭道德观(严父模式和慈亲模式),进而验证Lakoff(2004)的"国家是家庭"道德概念隐喻假设,结果显示:1)民主党候选人具有明显的慈亲模式道德观倾向,而共和党候选人具有明显的严父模式道德观倾向;2)语料库主题词网络显示民主和共和两党候选人的用词分别带有明显慈亲和严父特征。研究支持Lakoff的"国家是家庭"道德概念隐喻假设。The study aims to investigate whether Democrats and Republicans have different family moral models(the strict father model and the nurturant parent model) with the assistance of a corpus of American presidential candidates’ speeches, and testify the accountability of conceptual metaphor: ‘Nation is a family’. The research shows that 1) Democratic candidates tend to adopt the nurturant parent model in their speeches whereas Republican candidates tend to cling to the strict father model;2) that the presidential candidates from the two parties choose words according to characteristics of the two models that they use respectively. The findings of this study further support Lakoff’s conceptual metaphor hypothesis: ‘Nation is a family’.

关 键 词：政治话语 国家是家庭 严父模式道德观 慈亲模式道德观 语料库 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]