检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭露 Tan Lu(Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Junan County,Linyi 276600,Shandong Province,China)
出 处:《中国社区医师》2022年第1期42-44,共3页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:探讨骨伤治疗仪对骨科临床常见的肱骨干、胫骨骨折延迟愈合的临床治疗效果。方法:选取2018年10月-2020年10月肱骨干、胫骨骨折患者256例,按照治疗方式不同分为两组,各128例。试验组应用骨伤治疗仪,对照组给予常规治疗,比较两组治疗效果。结果:试验组治疗总有效率高于对照组,延迟愈合率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组治疗后抑郁自评量表评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:应用骨伤治疗仪辅助治疗肱骨干、胫骨骨折患者,能够满足患者治疗需求,尤其是在患者延迟愈合情况改善方面更具有明显优势。Objective:To explore the clinical treatment effect of bone injury therapy instrument on the delayed healing of humeral shaft and tibial fractures,which are common in clinical practice of orthopedics.Methods:From October 2018 to October 2020,256 patients with humeral shaft and tibial fractures were selected and divided into two groups according to different treatment methods,with 128 cases in each group.The experimental group was treated with bone injury therapy instrument.The control group received conventional treatment.The therapeutic effects between the two groups were compared.Results:The total effective rate in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group,and the delayed healing rate was lower than that in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).SDS score of the experimental group after treatment was lower than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The application of bone injury therapy instrument to assist the treatment of humeral shaft and tibial fractures can meet the treatment needs of patients,especially it had has obvious advantages in the improvement of delayed healing of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.185.23