机构地区:[1]辽宁省辽阳市第二人民医院,辽宁辽阳111000
出 处:《中国医药指南》2022年第5期45-48,共4页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的研究分析病毒性心肌炎应用综合护理干预的临床效果。方法从我院2017年8月至2018年8月接诊的病毒性心肌炎患者中选80例。研究中根据随机原理分为对照组(n=40)和观察组(n=40)。所有患者均采取同一种治疗方法,对照组患者辅以常规性护理措施,观察组患者则接受综合护理干预。对比不同护理措施取得的效果。结果①观察组(38例,占95.00%)患者经过护理以后满意度水平明显比对照组(33例,占82.50%)更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②观察组(3例,占7.50%)患者护理以后的并发症发生率明显比对照组(13例,占32.50%)患者更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③护理以前,两组患者在焦虑和抑郁情绪方面均表现不佳,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组患者护理之后的焦虑、抑郁等负面情绪的改善效果明显比对照组更好,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。④护理以前,两组患者在肌酸激酶、同工酶和乳酸脱氢酶水平方面均表现不佳,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组患者护理之后的肌酸激酶、同工酶和乳酸脱氢酶水平等改善效果明显比对照组更好,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。⑤护理前,两组患者的SF-36生活质量量表评分方面较低,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),护理后观察组患者的SF-36生活质量量表评分明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论综合性护理干预应用于病毒性心肌炎患者中对改善临床护理现状有明显的效果,可显著提升患者的整体满意度,降低并发症的发生概率,缓解患者的负面情绪,纠正患者的心肌指标,提高整体生活质量,值得推荐。Objective To study and analyze the clinical effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on viral myocarditis.Methods From August 2017 to August 2018,80 patients with viral myocarditis were selected.According to the principle of random number table,the study was divided into control group(n=40)and observation group(n=40).All patients were treated with the same method.The patients in the control group were supplemented with routine nursing measures,while the patients in the observation group received comprehensive nursing intervention.To compare the effect of different nursing measures.Results(1)The satisfaction level of patients in the observation group(38 cases,accounting for 95.00%)after nursing was significantly higher than that of the control group(33 cases,accounting for 82.50%),and the difference in grade data was statistically significant(P<0.05).(2)The incidence of complications after nursing in the observation group(3 cases,accounting for 7.50%)was significantly lower than that of the control group(13 cases,accounting for 32.50%),and the difference in count data was statistically significant(P<0.05).(3)Before nursing,the two groups of patients performed poorly in anxiety and depression,and there was no statistically significant difference in measurement data(P>0.05).The observation group had a significant improvement in anxiety,depression and other negative emotions after nursing.Better than the control group,the difference in measurement data was statistically significant(P<0.05).(4)Before nursing,the two groups of patients had poor performance in the levels of creatine kinase,isoenzyme and lactate dehydrogenase,and the measurement there was no statistically significant difference in data(P>0.05).The improvement effects of creatine kinase,isoenzyme,and lactate dehydrogenase levels of patients in the observation group after nursing were significantly better than those in the control group,and the difference in measurement data was statistically significant(P<0.05).(5)Before nursing,the SF-36 quality of l
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...