特殊个体的原理价值及其局限性——论泽柳政太郎的亚洲主义思想  

On the Pan-Asianism of Masataro Sawayanagi: A Critical Review

作　　者：刘峰 LIU Feng(School of Humanities,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234)

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学外国语学院日语系、人文学院世界史系,上海200234 [2]上海市"世界文学多样性与文明互鉴"创新团队

出　　处：《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期143-151,共9页Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“20世纪的历史学和历史学家”(19ZDA235);国家社会科学基金重大项目“近代以来二战结束期间日本涉华宣传史料整理与研究”(20&ZD237)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：一战以后,近代日本的亚洲主义者在面对中国汹涌澎湃的反日浪潮时内心是极度失落的,以致于在此后开始对其思想理论展开重大调整。虽然其主流在于将国家改造运动与亚洲主义捆绑起来,但其中亦不乏别样的论调。而正是这些论调,展现出了与众不同的特殊原理性。尤其是泽柳政太郎,曾脱逸出以往“东方vs西方”的思维范式而将亚洲主义定义为足以与欧美并存共生的跨国境、超民族理念,以便将其作为通往世界主义的桥梁与当时盛行的“国联构想”进行融合。然而从其理论中所包含的日本盟主论等色彩来看,泽柳亦终究无法克服历史的局限性、无法跨越出扩张主义意识形态的范畴,未能将发展亚洲、世界大同作为目的,其本质仍停留在鼓吹日本利益优先的“亚洲门罗主义”层次而应予以批判。After the First World War,the Asianists in modern Japan were extremely disappointed in the face of the surging anti-Japanese wave in China,so that they began to make major adjustments to their thoughts and theories.Although the mainstream lied in tying up the national transformation movement with Asianism,there was no lack of other arguments that showed a unique and special principle.Of particular notice is Masataro Sawayanagi who once broke away from the previous thinking paradigm of“Eastern vs.West”and defined Asianism as a transnational and super-national idea that a unified Asia could coexist with Europe and the United States.In other words,he tried to describe Asianism as a kind of medium for cosmopolitanism so as to let it integrate into the prevailing vision of the League of Nations at that time.However,in terms of the Japanese hegemony theory contained in his theory,Sawayanagi was also unable to overcome his limitations,failing to transcend the category of expansionist ideology and take the development of Asia and the whole world as a goal.In essence,it was still confined to the level of“Asian Monroe Doctrine”that advocated the priority of Japanese interests and should thus be criticized.

关 键 词：日本 亚洲主义 泽柳政太郎 世界主义 

分 类 号：D093.13[政治法律—政治学]