检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王梅[1] WANG Mei(School of History and Culture,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610064,China)
出 处:《安徽师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第1期80-87,共8页Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“中国国会会议史”(19ZDA210);国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“北洋时期国家财政预算研究”(21FZB005)。
摘 要:清末民初预算“分科”形式存在层级参差、“一官一款”、科目密集等缺陷,从多个方面影响预算施行:层级参差使立法科目及行政科目间界限混淆,政府无统一执行标准;“一官一款”既加剧预算审议中的矛盾,又对政府收支限制过严,执行中问题叠出;科目密集引起预算膨胀,使预算无法施行,促使政府变革。清末民初预算“分科”由彼时不断变化的财政状况与变革需求塑造,反过来又成为影响财政与政治走势的隐秘的桎梏。The budget division had affected budget execution in many aspects in the end of Qing dynasty and the beginning of the Republic of China,such as hierarchical discrepancy,"specific fund for a specific official",intensive division.First,the different standards of budgetary accounts had confused government execution,which made it difficult for the government to set a uniform standard.Second,budgetary accounts had intensified the conflict and seriously restricted the government's revenues.Thus,numerous problems appeared.Third,dense budgetary accounts had made the budget too inflated to execute,which pressed the government to reform.Shaped by the changeable financial conditions and demand for reform,budget division became intangible shackles that affected finance and politics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.134.253.192