国家治理视野下公证参与检察公益诉讼路径探索  

Exploring the Path to Notary’s Participation in Procuratorial Public Interest Litigation from the National Governance Perspective

作　　者：齐玎 张晓红 Qi Ding;Zhang Xiaohong(School of Law,Jimei University,Xiamen,Fujian 361023;Lujiang Notary Public Office,Xiamen,Fujian 361003)

机构地区：[1]集美大学法学院,福建厦门361023 [2]福建省厦门市鹭江公证处,福建厦门361003

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2022年第1期129-138,共10页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：2021年度福建省中青年教师教育科研项目“国家治理视野下公证参与检察公益诉讼法律问题研究”(项目编号:JAS21109)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：检察公益诉讼作为一项立足中国国情、具有中国特色的新制度,近年在推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化进程中取得了积极成效,同时也存在制约其治理效能发挥的现实短板。在国家治理视野下,可以通过挖掘检察制度和公证制度的制度潜力,探索实现检察机关的法律监督职能与公证机构的服务、沟通、证明、监督职能相互叠加赋能,同时充分发挥公证机构在保全证据、预防纠纷、承接辅助性工作及信息化建设过程中的独特优势和丰富实践经验,形成公益保护合力,进一步发挥检察公益诉讼在国家治理效能中的制度优势。As a newly developed litigation mechanism with Chinese characteristics,the Procuratorial Public Interest Litigation(PPIL)has achieved significant success in the process of modernizing the national governance system and governance capabilities in recent years,and there are also practical shortcomings restricting the play of its governance effectiveness.In the vision of national governance,it is of great value for procuratorial organs and notarial institutions to give full play to their core functions to jointly promote the innovation and development of the PPIL,while relying on the unique advantages and empirical experience of notarial institutions in the process of evidence preservation,dispute prevention and resolution,undertaking auxiliary work,information technology construction,etc.to enrich the institutional value of the mechanism in the modernization of national governance.

关 键 词：公益诉讼 检察监督权 公证职能 国家治理 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]