《时间的噪音》中肖斯塔科维奇懦夫形象及其成因  

Shostakovich's Coward Image and Its Reasons in The Noise of Time

作　　者：罗海燕 王桃花 LUO Haiyan;WANG Taohua(School of Foreign Languages,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学外国语学院,广东广州510275

出　　处：《武陵学刊》2022年第1期84-90,105,共8页Journal of Wuling

基　　金：中山大学党建研究委托项目“新形势下高校‘党建+课程思政’协同育人模式研究”(SYSUDJ202102);中山大学本科教学质量工程项目。

摘　　要：在对《时间的噪音》的评论中,很多评论者认为,肖斯塔科维奇成为“懦夫”是被动的无奈选择,却忽视了这些无奈选择之中的主动因素。他在面临爱情、代际、政治的伦理选择时,试图颠覆传统的婚恋伦理,突破母性桎梏的代际伦理,反对黑暗统治的政治伦理。他主动选择自己认为正确的行为方式,挑战伦理和社会结构间的关系。从后现代伦理学角度分析肖斯塔科维奇身处集权社会困境下做出的伦理选择,有助于读者深刻而全面认识这位作曲家,思考人类的生存状态和未来。In their review of The Noise of Time,many commentators argued that Shostakovich's“cowardice”was a passive choice,ignoring that it was actually his active choice.When facing the ethical choices of love,generation and politics,he tried to subvert the traditional marriage ethics,break through the intergenerational ethics of maternal shackles and oppose the political ethics of dark rule.He actively chooses what he thinks is the right way to behave,challenging the relationship between ethics and social structure.Analyzing Shostakovich's ethical choices in the plight of totalitarian society from the perspective of postmodern ethics will help readers to have a profound and comprehensive understanding of the composer and understand the author's postmodern ethical concerns.

关 键 词：朱利安·巴恩斯 《时间的噪音》 婚恋伦理 代际伦理 政治伦理 

分 类 号：I561.074[文学—其他各国文学]