检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张国强 ZHANG Guo-qiang(School of Foreign Languages,Dezhou University,Dezhou Shandong 253023,China)
出 处:《德州学院学报》2022年第1期89-93,共5页Journal of Dezhou University
摘 要:面对高度竞争、市场化的环境,现代大学治理需要提高效率、减少资源消耗,但是大学教师评议会这种传统的社团式学术治理仍然是多数英语国家大学中的主要治理方式。大学教师评议会面临着来自高级管理人员和行政管理体制等方面的严峻挑战,形成了功能型、影响型、仪式型和冲突型四种不同类型的评议会。不同国家的不同类型的大学在不同时期,其大学教师评议会最大的不同在其功能或责任上。但是,大学教师评议会在与行政管理人员博弈过程中保持了共同体传统,成为大学传统的守护者。It is claimed that college governance is appropriate and effective as a primary mechanism for decision-making in contemporary universities although it is inconsistent with the competitive and market-based environment facing contemporary universities within which decisions regarding management of reduced resources need be made quickly.The faculty senates are facing serious challenges from senior management and the administrative system.For understanding faculty senates they are divided into four models:functional,influential,ceremonial,and subverted.These models provide a conceptual frame to comprehend senates in the different functions and responsibilities in improving the effectiveness of campus governance.They maintains the community tradition in the process of playing games with administrators and can not stand still any more,but should adopt new technology and new strategies to face the challenge positively.
分 类 号:G64[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229