检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨逢珉[1] 田洋洋 YANG Feng-min;TIAN Yang-yang(School of Business,East China University of Science and Technology,Shanghai 200237,China)
出 处:《技术经济与管理研究》2022年第1期88-93,共6页Journal of Technical Economics & Management
基 金:2014年度上海市社科规划课题(2014BJL001)。
摘 要:文章基于联合国商品贸易数据库中2006-2018年的数据,采用技术复杂度对中日韩三国农产品的技术结构进行分析。研究结果显示:一是中国出口的农产品技术结构仍然是以低技术产品和中低技术产品为主,高技术产品和中高技术产品的比重略有上升;日韩出口的农产品均是以高技术产品和中高技术产品为主。二是中日韩三国农产品出口技术复杂度指数整体均呈现出稳定增长的趋势,但日韩的增长速度高于中国。三是中国在水产品、园艺产品及其他农产品上具有明显的出口竞争力,日本在水产品和其他农产品方面具有较大的比较优势,韩国则在水产品、园艺产品、谷物产品及其他农产品出口上都呈现较强的竞争力态势。Based on the 2006-2018 data from the United Nations Commodity Trade Database, this paper analyzes the technical structure of agricultural products in China, Japan and Korea using technical complexity. The research results show that: The technical structure of agricultural products exported by China is still dominated by low-tech products and low-medium-tech products, and the proportion of high-tech products and medium-high-tech products has increased slightly;Most of the agricultural products exported by Japan and South Korea are high-tech products and medium-high-tech products. The technical complexity index of agricultural products export of China, Japan and South Korea all showed a steady growth trend, but Japan and South Korea grew faster than China. China has obvious export competitiveness in aquatic products, horticultural products and other agricultural products. Japan has a comparative advantage in aquatic products and other agricultural products, while South Korea’s aquatic products, horticultural products, cereal products and other agricultural products have a strong competitive position.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33