语境论与语义最简论之争:知识图谱的动态计量  

The disputation between contextualism and semantic minimalism:a bibliometric mapping-knowledge-domain analysis

作　　者：曹笃鑫 向明友 贾勉 CAO Duxin;XIANG Mingyou;JIA Mian

机构地区：[1]中国科学院大学 [2]对外经济贸易大学 [3]德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校

出　　处：《外语教学理论与实践》2021年第4期8-23,共16页Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金青年项目“句法语用界面视域下英汉语轻动词构式演化路径对比研究”(项目编号:21CYY003);中国科学院中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“英汉轻动词构式的历时演变与语言演化规律研究(项目编号:E0E48950)”;国家哲学社会科学规划青年项目“话语标记语演变的句法语用界面研究”(项目编号:18CYY002);教育部人文社科一般项目“英汉独词句的认知对比研究:情境植入视角”(项目编号:17YJA740010)的阶段性成果~~。

摘　　要：本文采用文献动态计量方法,借助引文可视化分析软件CiteSpaceⅤ绘制语境论与语义最简论之争的动态知识图谱。研究发现:近30年来语境论与语义最简论之争由哲学一统江湖到哲学与语言学二分天下,且后者势头强劲,逐步摆脱哲学的束缚,渐成独立的研究分支。在研究动向上,语用学与哲学主战场不谋而合,前者表现为对客观主义真值条件论的反省或背弃,后者表现为从客观真理到主观真理的转向。This article adopts CiteSpaceⅤto make a bibliometric analysis of the debate between Contextualism and Semantic Minimalism from A&HCI and SSCI database.By integrating two sources of evidence—scientific statistical data and stereoscopic intellectual structure,we attempt to detect and visualize the transient patterns and emerging trends and frontiers in this area.The results reveal that the debate was previously dominated by philosophers and then is divided between philosophers and linguists,with the former initiating a turn from objective truth to subjective truth,and the latter questioning or even renouncing the objective truth-conditional semantics in favor of a pioneering branch—truth-conditional pragmatics.

关 键 词：语境论 语义最简论 文献计量学分析 知识图谱 CiteSpaceⅤ 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学] H030[语言文字—语言学]