检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王大哲 钱文荣 WANG Da-zhe;QIAN Wen-rong(School of Economics,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing 210023,Jiangsu,China;School of Public Management,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,Zhejiang,China)
机构地区:[1]南京财经大学经济学院,江苏南京210023 [2]浙江大学公共管理学院,浙江杭州310058
出 处:《消费经济》2021年第6期71-80,共10页Consumer Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA088)。
摘 要:文章利用浙江大学CRHPS2013-2017面板数据中的农村住户数据,采用面板固定效应模型,从总量和结构视角实证检验农地征收对农户消费的影响,并对其影响机制和异质性进行了探索。研究结果表明:(1)从消费总量来看,农地征收显著增加了农户的总消费水平,且倾向得分匹配结果也仍然稳健。(2)从消费结构来看,被征地农户的消费结构仍以生存型消费为主,农地征收并没有显著提高被征地农户健康、教育培训等人力资本投资,也没有提高休闲娱乐旅游等享受型消费。总体来说,农地征收没有促进农户消费结构的实质性转变和升级。(3)机制检验表明,获得非货币补偿的被征地农户的消费并没有得到显著提高,征地通过工资性收入对消费水平的促进作用也是有限的,征地消费效应的主要来源仍是征地的货币补偿。(4)异质性分析表明,征地货币补偿显著缓解了年轻人为主农户及受教育程度较低农户的流动性约束,征地补偿对农户消费的促进作用仅能维持在5年以内。本文的研究启示未来农户应对征地补偿进行合理配置,也启示我国未来征地制度改革需更加注重为被征地农户提供多元化的非货币补偿和社会保障。T his paper uses the data of rural households in the panel data of CRHPS 2013-2017 of Zhejiang University,uses the panel fixed effects model to conduct empirical tests,and explores its influence mechanism and group heterogeneity.The research results show that:(1)In terms of total amount,farmland expropriation has significantly increased the total consumption of farmers,and the results of the propensity score matching method are still stable.(2)From the perspective of consumption structure,the consumption structure of land-expropriated farmers is still dominated by subsistence consumption.Farmland expropriation has not significantly improved the human capital investment of land-expropriated farmers’health,education and training,nor has it improved the enjoyment of leisure,entertainment,and tourism.In general,the expropriation of agricultural land has not promoted the substantial transformation and upgrading of the consumption structure of farmers.(3)The mechanism test shows that the consumption of land-expropriated farmers who received non-monetary compensation has not been significantly improved,and the promotion of consumption through wage income by land acquisition is also limited.The main source of the consumption effect of land acquisition is still monetary compensation.(4)The analysis of heterogeneity shows that monetary compensation for land acquisition has significantly eased the mobility constraints of young farmers and farmers with lower education levels,but the promotion of land acquisition compensation on farmers’consumption can only be maintained within 5 year.The research in this article enlightens farmers in the future to reasonably allocate compensation for land acquisition,and also suggests that China’s future land acquisition system reforms need to pay more attention to providing diversified non-monetary compensation and social security mechanisms for land-expropriated farmers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222