检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段怡嫣 翟国方[1] 李文静[1,2] Duan Yiyan;Zhai Guofang;Li Wenjing
机构地区:[1]南京大学建筑与城市规划学院 [2]安徽大学商学院
出 处:《国际城市规划》2021年第6期79-85,共7页Urban Planning International
摘 要:近年来在城市研究与城乡规划领域,城市韧性正作为应对风险的一种理念受到广泛关注。本文从城市韧性内涵和数值的表征方式出发,对当前城市韧性的测度方法进行总结,认为多样的测度方法可被归入基于过程、基于状态两种评估路径之下。通过对国际案例的梳理,文章阐述了两种评估路径下城市韧性所关注的重点和具体测度方法,指出各自所适用的实践情境,并就今后我国城市韧性测度的发展方向提出了动态化、精细化和多元化等思考。In recent literatures about urban studies,urban resilience has been widely discussed as a strategy to copy with risk.Based on concepts and theories of urban resilience summarized from existing researches,this paper proposes two analyzing paradigms to conduct quantitative measurement with introduction to cases of assessment on urban resilience in international practice,which is to analyze urban resilience as a process and as an outcome.Furthermore,the differences of epistemology around and quantitative methods of urban resilience involved in these two paradigms are elaborated subsequently,and lead to a suggestion that quantitative measurement of resilience in China should follow the epistemology drawn from local practices.Meanwhile,this paper also suggests that more dynamic,precise and diversified measurement will contribute to a more comprehensive assessment of urban resilience in the future of China.
关 键 词:城市韧性 韧性测度 韧性评估 韧性评价指标 韧性分析范式
分 类 号:TU984[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.81.99